ついったのほうにレポートの話を書いたので載せてみる。英語の授業、って言っても色々ありますが、俺が今期とってるのは英語ディベートの授業ですよ、と。これは一つ前の課題で、ディベートでは地球温暖化についれあれこれ言い合った結果、個人的にはこのレポートに至りました。現実とどう向き合うか、ですね。あと、エコってなんぞや、とかね。
思いの外長くなりました。まあ、けど書くべきことを書けばこのくらいにはなるものです。ぶっちゃけ、今まででここまでの長さを書いたことはなくて、4,5時間くらい費やしてるんじゃないかなと思う。もっと長いかもしれない。切り口を考えるのに2時間くらいかかって、実際書いてる時間はもっと短いと思うけど。630字、って全然高校の時読んでた長文と変わらんですね、と後で気づいた。文章はつたないですが、はっはっ。
んまあ、けど意識的に体系的に書いたし、主張を補強する具体例もはさみながら。昔よりはマシだと自分でも思うけどね。評価も三段階の真ん中をもらいました。基本、あの先生は一番下の評価しかしない人なので、俺が一番びっくりした。去年も同じ先生の授業とってて、ボロクソに評価されてたからねｗささやかな成長か。だがスペルミスは多いorz
***
In the class, we have been debating in various views about the global warming. How can we stop the global warming? Is it possible? Can Japanese reduce carbon dioxide dramatically? I think that there are the right answers about them, because i am not a scientist, and i cannot if i were a scientist, i cannot exactly judge the fact about the global warming. So, the main issue in this report is about not the fact about the global warming, but the risk about the global warming, especially the logical risk and emotional.
There are some risks against the global warming. First, it is the recognition of the people. The global warming is the issue all over the world. In America President Obama said green new deal, in Japan Prime Minister Hatoyama said that Japan reduce carbon dioxide as 25 percent. The international conference called COP were held 15 times, and this conference will last. The point about their acts is politically, so there are only disicions. Disicion making is the job of the goverments and it may important, but are their acts really effective in preventing the global warming? I think that point is not so discussed. The global warming is a very complicated phenomenon, so it is more important to undersatnd the reality about it.
Next, I feel something about japanese mass media. These days, the word of "eco" is often used by japanese mass media. Thinking about the energy, it is good to use less energy. But, does it involve with the global warming? Do japanese mass media intentionally involve eco with the global warming? As the word of eco is used more and more, the objects which is not eco may become bad. It is very risky because eco is the perfect as science is the so. It is wonderful to act for the solution of the global warming, but it also has the limits. At least, the chorus of eco by media is not so contributed to the solution of this problem. It may enlight the concious of the people, but it may also give false cognition to the people.
The global warming may not only a climate affair, and so it is difficult to solove. However, this is the problem which is not permitted for all of the human beings to give it up. if it does not dramatically prevent the global warming, there are something to do with the energy affair. For example, these days the hybrid cars and the electric cars are invented and improved by a lot of car companies in the world, especially in Japan and China. The oil is unstable in the point of price, and it expells much dirty gases with carbon dioxide. The hybrid cars and the electric cars may be in place of the gasolin cars in the future. So, there are two works, which are what we must and what we can. It is no use debating about what we cannot such as reducing carbon dioxide as 25% in japan by a year of 2025. it is really necessary for the world to debate and think what we must and what we can. There should be many countries such as America, China, and Russia, and the developed countries should corporate the developing countries.
The global warming is not only an international politcal problem but also a problem for all of the human beings in the earth. We citizen also have the responsibility. We sholud get more knowledge about this phenomenon, support or criticize the policy of the goverment and use less enegry in daily life.In the point, japanese mass media already enphasize by saying eco, just it may be excessive. The global warming is a big homeworks for all of the people to submit difficutly. (630words)
思いの外長くなりました。まあ、けど書くべきことを書けばこのくらいにはなるものです。ぶっちゃけ、今まででここまでの長さを書いたことはなくて、4,5時間くらい費やしてるんじゃないかなと思う。もっと長いかもしれない。切り口を考えるのに2時間くらいかかって、実際書いてる時間はもっと短いと思うけど。630字、って全然高校の時読んでた長文と変わらんですね、と後で気づいた。文章はつたないですが、はっはっ。
んまあ、けど意識的に体系的に書いたし、主張を補強する具体例もはさみながら。昔よりはマシだと自分でも思うけどね。評価も三段階の真ん中をもらいました。基本、あの先生は一番下の評価しかしない人なので、俺が一番びっくりした。去年も同じ先生の授業とってて、ボロクソに評価されてたからねｗささやかな成長か。だがスペルミスは多いorz
***
In the class, we have been debating in various views about the global warming. How can we stop the global warming? Is it possible? Can Japanese reduce carbon dioxide dramatically? I think that there are the right answers about them, because i am not a scientist, and i cannot if i were a scientist, i cannot exactly judge the fact about the global warming. So, the main issue in this report is about not the fact about the global warming, but the risk about the global warming, especially the logical risk and emotional.
There are some risks against the global warming. First, it is the recognition of the people. The global warming is the issue all over the world. In America President Obama said green new deal, in Japan Prime Minister Hatoyama said that Japan reduce carbon dioxide as 25 percent. The international conference called COP were held 15 times, and this conference will last. The point about their acts is politically, so there are only disicions. Disicion making is the job of the goverments and it may important, but are their acts really effective in preventing the global warming? I think that point is not so discussed. The global warming is a very complicated phenomenon, so it is more important to undersatnd the reality about it.
Next, I feel something about japanese mass media. These days, the word of "eco" is often used by japanese mass media. Thinking about the energy, it is good to use less energy. But, does it involve with the global warming? Do japanese mass media intentionally involve eco with the global warming? As the word of eco is used more and more, the objects which is not eco may become bad. It is very risky because eco is the perfect as science is the so. It is wonderful to act for the solution of the global warming, but it also has the limits. At least, the chorus of eco by media is not so contributed to the solution of this problem. It may enlight the concious of the people, but it may also give false cognition to the people.
The global warming may not only a climate affair, and so it is difficult to solove. However, this is the problem which is not permitted for all of the human beings to give it up. if it does not dramatically prevent the global warming, there are something to do with the energy affair. For example, these days the hybrid cars and the electric cars are invented and improved by a lot of car companies in the world, especially in Japan and China. The oil is unstable in the point of price, and it expells much dirty gases with carbon dioxide. The hybrid cars and the electric cars may be in place of the gasolin cars in the future. So, there are two works, which are what we must and what we can. It is no use debating about what we cannot such as reducing carbon dioxide as 25% in japan by a year of 2025. it is really necessary for the world to debate and think what we must and what we can. There should be many countries such as America, China, and Russia, and the developed countries should corporate the developing countries.
The global warming is not only an international politcal problem but also a problem for all of the human beings in the earth. We citizen also have the responsibility. We sholud get more knowledge about this phenomenon, support or criticize the policy of the goverment and use less enegry in daily life.In the point, japanese mass media already enphasize by saying eco, just it may be excessive. The global warming is a big homeworks for all of the people to submit difficutly. (630words)
